Barry Demonstrates His "Scientific" Debate Tactics Again

Space/Science » in reply to re: Probably Because Thermal Cycles Are An Obvious Alternative

Mark Eby — 6/8/2003 3:17:59 AM (archived)

Barry I will not waste time on your infantile posts with assertions of unprovable and poorly supported motives. If you want to debate science stick to it. Science does not allow use of conspiracy theories to explain away inconvenient data. Otherwise I'm quite content to let you make a fool of yourself. Write a post that sticks to scientific standards of evidence and I will reply.

Later

The whole thread (16 posts)

Historic Mars lander 'did find life' - BD - 6/6/2003 10:10:35 AM
- Old news - Don - 6/6/2003 1:21:28 PM
  - Probably Because Thermal Cycles Are An Obvious Alternative - Mark Eby - 6/7/2003 11:24:25 PM
    - re: Thermal Cycles explained in paper - need to read first - BD - 6/8/2003 12:51:19 AM
      - PS - Mark Eby - 6/8/2003 3:26:46 AM
      - Yeap - Mark Eby - 6/8/2003 3:24:24 AM
    - re: Probably Because Thermal Cycles Are An Obvious Alternative - BD - 6/8/2003 12:27:47 AM
      - Barry Demonstrates His "Scientific" Debate Tactics Again - Mark Eby - 6/8/2003 3:17:59 AM
  - re: Old news - bd - 6/7/2003 9:15:13 PM
  - Who has been pushing Levin's baloney? - Gary - 6/6/2003 3:24:46 PM
    - re: Who has been pushing Levin's baloney? - BD - 6/7/2003 9:06:49 PM
    - re: Who has been pushing Levin's baloney? - Johannes - 6/7/2003 1:33:02 PM
      - Life in the galaxy should be common - Gary - 6/8/2003 4:39:24 AM
      - He didn't say that - Larry J - 6/7/2003 3:21:05 PM
        
        Larry J has got it mostly right - Gary - 6/8/2003 4:22:03 AM
        
        re: He didn't say that - Delbert - 6/7/2003 6:09:37 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)