Current Events » in reply to So Saddam DID have WMD?

The whole thread (20 posts)

• Nation misled into war in Iraq - Don - 6/11/2003 1:40:20 PM
  • Don Quixote, this is great! - ebnelson - 6/12/2003 3:05:20 AM
  • Krugman is full of it...a continuing series. - Tom Brosz - 6/11/2003 3:50:49 PM
  • The cover-up begins - Don - 6/11/2003 2:27:27 PM
    • The ASSumptions of Don Quixote - ebnelson - 6/12/2003 3:30:26 AM
    • To reinforce the point - Don - 6/11/2003 2:34:15 PM
      • re: To reinforce the point - McFly - 6/11/2003 3:50:10 PM
        • nightmare scenario - FrankC - 6/11/2003 4:11:27 PM
        • So Saddam DID have WMD? - Tom Brosz - 6/11/2003 3:55:14 PM
          • re: choices - Raoul - 6/11/2003 9:50:09 PM
          • re: So Saddam DID have WMD? - McFly - 6/11/2003 5:56:54 PM
            • re: So Saddam DID have WMD? - Tom Brosz - 6/11/2003 9:07:35 PM
          • Getting any traction from your repeated "coulda, mighta, woulda" arguements? (n/t) - alcaray - 6/11/2003 4:28:33 PM
            • Some President's think of 'coulda woulda shoulda' and hope for the best - ebnelson - 6/12/2003 3:42:38 AM
            • "coulda, mighta, woulda" arguments - Tom Brosz - 6/11/2003 4:57:33 PM
              • That wasn't you who said "The obvious question that follows is how safe would we have been with Saddam in power for the next twenty years and possessing those weapons?"? (n/t) - alcaray - 6/11/2003 5:12:53 PM
                • Isn't that a reasonable question? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 6/11/2003 5:42:39 PM
                  • Did I characterize it incorrectly? (n/t) - alcaray - 6/11/2003 9:11:34 PM
          • The pot calls the kettle black, and other wobbly arguments - Splinx - 6/11/2003 4:21:09 PM
            • re: The pot - Tom Brosz - 6/11/2003 4:51:51 PM