The main point I was making was that some of the anti-Bush arguments are logically mutually exclusive. To put it plainly, one cannot argue simultaneously that Saddam had no WMD, and that we have to be concerned about Iraq's WMD being dispersed to terrorists.

I don't worry about Israel having nuclear weapons any more than I worry about Britain having nuclear weapons. I know why this is the case, and why Israel is different from Iraq or North Korea, and so do you.

As for the biologicals canard, I'm thinking of making up a document called "Lies the Left Keeps Repeating Over and Over Again After They've Had Their Noses Rubbed in the Truth," and having Robert post it somewhere here so I can save on typing.

We sent Iraq, a long time ago, biological samples that were either mostly harmless or rendered inert, for research purposes. While one could argue that a bioweapons program could still make use of such things, it's a long way from shipping weapons of mass destruction to Iraq.

Please feel free to check out the shipping list yourself.