Rather amusing you commenting on any science Barry considering you still haven't bothered to explain that old and glaring panspermia two step. I'll let Chris and others debate the relative importance of low budget Mars hab science with you. I don't see the point in addressing criticisms of science from someone so blatently unscientific that he uses poorly supported panspermia mechanisms when they support his point and ignores or belittles better supported mechanisms because they don't. This, endless repetition of the same information, ignoring counter arguments to your claims, and resorting to conspiracy theories to explain general scientific consensus against your pet theories are key pillars of the pseudoscientist. I'll discuss science with you when you act like a scientist or at least scientifically literate.
There's plenty to discuss posted below if you would like to switch to a more technical track.
later
Space/Science » in reply to re: Well...Don's belief's
Barry's Babble
The whole thread (35 posts)
- Liquid Water in Solis Lacus, Mars.
- Proof or Spoof?
- Over here is a hole in the ground...
- The next thing you know...
- You went and don(e) it.
- re: The next thing you know...
- Well...
- re: Well...Don's belief's
- "MS supported BBS?" You got something to back that up? (n/t)
- Coincidental Reading
- Barry's Babble
- Actually Barry...
- re: Well...Don's belief's
- Well...
- Proof or Spoof?
