Current Events » in reply to 9/11 Panel: U.S. Hindering Probe

The whole thread (21 posts)

• 9/11 Panel: U.S. Hindering Probe - Splinx - 7/9/2003 3:52:28 PM
  • I thought the New York Times would have investigated this... - Scott Evil - 7/9/2003 8:45:40 PM
  • You sure you really want a 9/11 probe? - REB - 7/9/2003 4:37:36 PM
    • re: You sure you really want a 9/11 probe? - Fox - 7/9/2003 6:14:56 PM
      • re: You sure you really want a 9/11 probe? - REB - 7/9/2003 7:37:37 PM
      • Oh, come on. - Tom Brosz - 7/9/2003 6:27:24 PM
        • re: Oh, come on. - Fox - 7/10/2003 3:09:46 AM
        • That's no excuse for sticking our heads in the sand (n/t) - Robert - 7/9/2003 6:36:14 PM
          • Besides - Robert - 7/9/2003 6:38:49 PM
            • re: Besides - Tom Brosz - 7/9/2003 6:47:02 PM
              • But have justified faith - Davin L. - 7/9/2003 6:57:14 PM
                • Mildly rude post - alcaray - 7/9/2003 9:08:17 PM
                  • re: Mildly rude post - Davin L. - 7/9/2003 9:59:05 PM
                • re: But have justified faith - gbaikie - 7/9/2003 8:10:03 PM
    • In my naivete I like to think that the probe is not partisan - alcaray - 7/9/2003 6:00:05 PM
      • re: In my naivete I like to think that the probe is not partisan - REB - 7/9/2003 6:26:28 PM
    • What rational person wouldn't? CHECK THIS OUT - Lindy - 7/9/2003 5:32:12 PM
      • "Oh, you don't hear about it, but WE do." That's because you refuse to wear your tinfoil hats like the rest of us do. ;) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 7/9/2003 6:21:15 PM
        • All you need is a pair of glasses and a cup of coffee - Lindy - 7/9/2003 6:43:59 PM
          • Two cups of coffee - Tom Brosz - 7/9/2003 7:17:29 PM
      • I for one, but then I am a rational person (n/t) - p - 7/9/2003 5:42:43 PM