Space/Science » in reply to Are the editors and referees of Science magazine ignoring Hoffman's image of CO2 clathrate outgassing?

The whole thread (16 posts)

• Are the editors and referees of Science magazine ignoring Hoffman's image of CO2 clathrate outgassing? - E.P. Grondine - 7/10/2003 10:12:06 PM
  • I haven't submitted anything to them recently, so why should they? (n/t) - Nick Hoffman - 7/11/2003 6:48:39 AM
    • As submission is not necessary, why did they ignore it? - E.P. Grondine - 7/14/2003 9:11:34 PM
      • EP are you saying there is a conspiracy at the journal science to promote a manned mission to Mars? - Scott Evil - 7/15/2003 12:03:31 AM
      • Give example of where was this "widely reported"? (n/t) - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/14/2003 9:24:17 PM
        • Here ya go, skippy - E.P. Grondine - 7/15/2003 6:38:03 PM
          • You really are a dunce, Grondine - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/15/2003 6:51:46 PM
            • Thanks, Alex - E.P. Grondine - 7/15/2003 8:20:34 PM
              • You're welcome, Grondine - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/15/2003 8:37:38 PM
  • re: Are the editors and referees of Science magazine ignoring Hoffman's image of CO2 clathrate outgassing? - Bamf - 7/11/2003 2:27:32 AM
  • Your meds are wearing off, E.P. It's time to up your dosage. n/t (n/t) - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/10/2003 11:44:17 PM
    • Sorry, Alex, but no more "watery Mars" money for you... - E.P. Grondine - 7/14/2003 8:56:46 PM
      • Grondine, you're a real piece of work - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/14/2003 9:30:41 PM
        • Here ya go, skippy - E.P. Grondine - 7/15/2003 6:43:46 PM
          • Like I said above - Alex R. Blackwell - 7/15/2003 6:54:31 PM
            • covered above (n/t) - E.P. Grondine - 7/15/2003 8:24:11 PM