"Exceptions to this rule include planets on either side of the HZ, as such planets can conceivably accumulate large amounts of O2 abiotically. A planet with O3 in its atmosphere and liquid water on its surface, however, is very likely to be inhabited."
For reference Barry the habitable zone is the range where planets have liquid water on their surface.
Note the requirement for a coincidence of LIQUID water and ozone being an indicator of life not ozone alone. Once again you focus on a few sentences possibly supportive of your stance while ignoring the context of those comments. This article does not contradict anything Nick has said on this issue.
Chemical equilibrium and reaction rates still seem to be foreign terms to you as well. Is your lack of comprehension of what these terms mean why you have never responded to the issue of LR results kinetically resembling chemical rather than biochemical reactions?
Regards,
Mark
Space/Science » in reply to re: 03, water and Mars
The Junk Scientist Overlooks Key Quote In His Source Again
The whole thread (24 posts)
- CO2 on an Early Earth - no hinderence for life
- Help or hinderance?
- re: Lovelock
- re: Help or hinderance? CO2 and small bright sun
- Help or hinderance?
