Space/Science » in reply to 2 out of 3 isn't bad...

The whole thread (19 posts)

• Shenzhou 5: spy satellite? - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 6:35:34 AM
  • That big instrument pod - ebnelson - 10/19/2003 2:20:16 AM
  • Not in a very good orbit for reconnaissance - Larry J - 10/17/2003 8:14:36 PM
  • Hey RL, I know where you can point your laser. Just kidding n/t (n/t) - SteveS - 10/17/2003 2:39:45 PM
    • lol... Maybe Larry J can answer this...? - R.L. - 10/17/2003 8:59:57 PM
      • Good question - Larry J - 10/17/2003 9:54:41 PM
        • re: The problem is......... - Raoul - 10/18/2003 9:11:06 AM
          • Don't worry... - R.L. - 10/19/2003 12:25:09 AM
          • 2 out of 3 isn't bad... - Larry J - 10/18/2003 11:13:44 PM
            • re: I didn't expect anything less from you, sir (n/t) - Raoul - 10/19/2003 12:04:20 AM
              • Just calling it as I see it... - Larry J - 10/19/2003 12:27:37 AM
                • re: Divided - Raoul - 10/20/2003 7:15:15 PM
                • Hey! - R.L. - 10/19/2003 12:41:17 AM
  • re: Seeing the great Wall? - Raoul - 10/17/2003 2:38:42 PM
  • Washington Post: "Is China's space budget really $100 million annually, while NASA's is $15 BILLION? - SpaceProjects.com - 10/17/2003 1:33:12 PM
    • China is so grateful - ebnelson - 10/18/2003 11:30:52 AM
    • re: If you hand them the technology, how much R&D would they need . . . ? (n/t) - D. Spires - 10/17/2003 11:55:01 PM
      • Modern NASA was handed lots of R&D from "historic" NASA, but STILL costs over $15 billion annually... (n/t) - SpaceProjects.com - 10/18/2003 4:31:21 AM
        • re: R&D continues here, but apparently not so much in China for "done deals" from U.S. tech . . . - D. Spires - 10/21/2003 2:23:31 AM