Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re: Good reference, but I don't like the ether idea

Know what you mean...

Hi SM

Good point. Relativity is inescapeable. But that doesn't stop people from trying to try to "explain" it all over again.

Ever seen this crank's adverts at MSNBC?

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1581126018/ref=cm_cr_dp_2_1/002-2130864-6555244?v=glance&s=books&vi=customer-reviews

...he, Mark McCutcheon, makes some BIG claims and attempts to reformulate the LOT. No more pesky weak and nuclear forces, quantum theory and so forth... heck he even has a go at the work equation.

Ether theorists generally set out on the same path of "reformation", and cock-up utterly before they've left electrodynamics, let alone nuclear physics. But ether theories that retain GR's results have some value, because they're akin to string, spinor, spin-network and weave theories that try to give space-time "substance".

Adam

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (10 posts)