Had there been another president, there almost certainly would have never been question of invading Iraq.
Here, because Bush was going to do it anyway, other presidential hopefuls were asked their opinions.
This is very different.
First, it's about a non intervention policy (where pre-emptive war and occupation would still be unthinkable); second, it's about reacting to something they're confronted with.
Maybe, that's what Bush's advisors were counting on: patriotism that shut's any opposing voice, US troops (soldiers following orders) being ambushed. So whether the occupation wasn't successful or was, in both cases, patriotism saves the day and the president.
And getting out of it becomes extremely difficult for anyone who never would have done this invasion.
Raoul
Current Events » in reply to re: Once again
re: Once again
The whole thread (28 posts)
- Baghdad blast kills U.S. soldier
- Meanwhile: Insecurity May Delay Iraq Constitution
- And then, this little tidbit...
- Finally: Military families speak against war
- You think your prayer for American collapse in Iraq is coming true?
- re: Military families speak against war
- Once again
- Bush has already failed?
- re: Once again
- Tom, Don knows he is lying.
- re: Once again
- Once again
- And to punctuate the point
- Finally: Military families speak against war
- And then, this little tidbit...
- Meanwhile: Insecurity May Delay Iraq Constitution
