re: re-usable LET

Space/Science » in reply to Double counting

re: re-usable LET

Raoul — 11/23/2003 11:29:19 AM (archived)

The SRBS's are ejected well past MaxQ and are recuperated.
Couldn't it be the same with a Lauch Escape Tower?
Making it waterproof and adding a parachute to it? It's not that heavy.

The whole thread (13 posts)

Capsules - Raoul - 11/22/2003 11:21:43 AM
- Launch escape vs Pad escape - Nick Hofman - 11/22/2003 12:06:48 PM
  - It'd have to be one hell of a catapault - Larry J - 11/23/2003 5:22:59 PM
  - An ugly aspect of practical engineering - Gary - 11/23/2003 5:22:51 AM
    - re:Why Hermes was cancelled - Raoul - 11/23/2003 5:50:20 PM
      - Hermes - Gary - 11/24/2003 5:46:02 AM
    - Double counting - Nick Hoffman - 11/23/2003 10:25:46 AM
      - re: re-usable LET - Raoul - 11/23/2003 11:29:19 AM
    - Escape tower mass estimate - Gary - 11/23/2003 5:30:41 AM
      - re: Escape tower mass estimate - Larry J - 11/24/2003 2:48:14 PM
  - re: Launch escape vs Pad escape - Tom Brosz - 11/22/2003 7:06:42 PM
    - re: Launch escape vs Pad escape - Nick Hoffman - 11/23/2003 2:53:01 AM
  - re: Launch escape vs Pad escape - Raoul - 11/22/2003 2:04:03 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (13 posts)