re: The secondary argument

Space/Science » in reply to The secondary argument

re: The secondary argument

JonClarke — 12/2/2003 4:29:25 AM (archived)

1) What would you consider proof?

2) Where has Hartman long claimed this feature as in impact crater?

3) Exhumation seems a reasonable explanation, probably difficult to confirm without more data.

4) To me the aureole looks like part of the fill of a multiring basin.

Jon

The whole thread (52 posts)

Bill Hartmann (Scientist, textbook/fiction Author, & Painter) - Mark Eby - 11/26/2003 3:23:18 AM
- More B*** S*** impact "science" - E.P. Grondine - 12/1/2003 12:11:52 AM
  - Anyone Else Ever Notice EP Almost Always Disagrees With Real Impact Scientists? ;-) (n/t) - Mark Eby - 12/1/2003 6:18:27 AM
    - Just Morrison's Clique - E.P. Grondine - 12/4/2003 12:31:28 AM
      - You Mean The Ones With Relevant Degrees? (n/t) - Mark Eby - 12/5/2003 3:55:43 AM
        
        re: Or with sufficient math to understand and do statistics? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/6/2003 12:18:26 AM
- Sense of humor, too - Robert - 11/26/2003 7:47:45 PM
- re: Bill Hartmann (Scientist, textbook/fiction Author, & Painter) - Nick Hoffman - 11/26/2003 6:59:37 PM
- re: Bill Hartmann - Raoul - 11/26/2003 5:08:34 PM
  - re: Bill Books - Mark Eby - 11/26/2003 5:23:14 PM
    - re: Bill Books - Raoul - 11/26/2003 6:58:09 PM
- Hartmann's Travelers Guide to Mars - Donald - 11/26/2003 4:04:24 PM
  - Look's Great! - Mark Eby - 11/29/2003 12:38:31 AM
- re: Bill Hartmann (Scientist, textbook/fiction Author, & Painter) - JonClarke - 11/26/2003 5:49:48 AM
  - Obnoxiously... - BRFelix - 11/27/2003 5:12:54 PM
    - Obnoxiously is right. - et - 11/28/2003 6:48:09 PM
      - Collapse, impact or something else? - BRFelix - 12/1/2003 2:23:55 PM
        
        Secondary Craters - Nick Hoffman - 12/1/2003 9:54:49 PM
        
        Here's a case for impact. - et - 12/1/2003 8:05:00 PM
        
        The secondary argument - BRFelix - 12/2/2003 12:27:38 AM
        
        re: The secondary argument - Nick Hoffman - 12/2/2003 8:04:58 AM
        
        Love that MOLA! - BRFelix - 12/3/2003 12:50:50 AM
        
        re: Love that MOLA! - et - 12/3/2003 8:37:37 PM
        
        Oh sorry! - BRFelix - 12/4/2003 8:25:24 PM
        
        re: Oh sorry! - JonClarke - 12/5/2003 12:14:05 AM
        
        What is it.... - BRFelix - 12/5/2003 4:32:41 AM
        
        re: What is it.... - JonClarke - 12/6/2003 2:49:06 AM
        
        I'm sure - BRFelix - 12/6/2003 5:56:52 PM
        
        re: I'm sure - JonClarke - 12/7/2003 3:26:49 AM
        
        re: Ground truth: the solution! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/6/2003 10:39:57 AM
        
        re: The secondary argument - JonClarke - 12/2/2003 4:29:25 AM
    - re: Obnoxiously... - JonClarke - 11/28/2003 5:45:18 AM
      - What happens rarely - BRFelix - 12/1/2003 2:26:49 PM
        
        re: What happens rarely - JonClarke - 12/2/2003 4:25:15 AM
        
        re: What happens rarely - BRFElix - 12/5/2003 2:24:45 PM
  - Answer Is Probably Related To Location - Mark Eby - 11/26/2003 5:04:07 PM
    - re: Answer Is Probably Related To Location - JonClarke - 11/26/2003 9:54:32 PM
  - re: Bill Hartmann (Scientist, textbook/fiction Author, & Painter) - Chris Vancil - 11/26/2003 10:12:42 AM
    - Atmosphere as filter, and landing site predictions... - Nick Hoffman - 11/26/2003 7:32:27 PM
      - re: Atmosphere as filter, and landing site predictions... - DTB - 11/28/2003 10:14:30 PM
        
        re: Atmosphere as filter, and landing site predictions... - Nick Hoffman - 11/29/2003 1:53:06 PM
        
        re: 2100m rim visible for ~100km? - DTB - 11/30/2003 2:55:23 AM
      - crater sizes - JonClarke - 11/27/2003 11:01:54 PM
        
        re: crater sizes - Nick Hoffman - 11/28/2003 1:22:13 AM
        
        re: crater sizes - JonClarke - 11/28/2003 3:15:53 AM
      - re: Atmosphere as filter, and landing site predictions... - JonClarke - 11/26/2003 9:51:15 PM
  - re: craters - Raoul - 11/26/2003 6:32:13 AM
    - re: craters - JonClarke - 11/26/2003 10:33:51 AM
      - I'm not seeing the small craters - pwokenyaw - 11/29/2003 7:47:15 PM
        
        re: I'm not seeing the small craters - Chris Vancil - 11/29/2003 9:20:51 PM
        
        thanks! the second photo is especially clear to me. n/t (n/t) - pwokenyaw - 11/30/2003 11:48:43 PM
      - re: craters - Raoul - 11/26/2003 5:02:50 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (52 posts)