Answer Is Probably Related To Location

Space/Science » in reply to re: Bill Hartmann (Scientist, textbook/fiction Author, & Painter)

Answer Is Probably Related To Location

Mark Eby — 11/26/2003 5:04:07 PM (archived)

I think we have put landers down in areas of interest for life or space craft safety. These would tend to be newer geograpically with fewer craters. His comments are probably based on the heavily cratered areas of Mars we have not landed in. I don't have my PS map of Mars with landing sites handy but I'll check.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (52 posts)

Bill Hartmann (Scientist, textbook/fiction Author, & Painter) - Mark Eby - 11/26/2003 3:23:18 AM
- More B*** S*** impact "science" - E.P. Grondine - 12/1/2003 12:11:52 AM
  - Anyone Else Ever Notice EP Almost Always Disagrees With Real Impact Scientists? ;-) (n/t) - Mark Eby - 12/1/2003 6:18:27 AM
    - Just Morrison's Clique - E.P. Grondine - 12/4/2003 12:31:28 AM
      - You Mean The Ones With Relevant Degrees? (n/t) - Mark Eby - 12/5/2003 3:55:43 AM
        
        re: Or with sufficient math to understand and do statistics? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/6/2003 12:18:26 AM
- Sense of humor, too - Robert - 11/26/2003 7:47:45 PM
- re: Bill Hartmann (Scientist, textbook/fiction Author, & Painter) - Nick Hoffman - 11/26/2003 6:59:37 PM
- re: Bill Hartmann - Raoul - 11/26/2003 5:08:34 PM
  - re: Bill Books - Mark Eby - 11/26/2003 5:23:14 PM
    - re: Bill Books - Raoul - 11/26/2003 6:58:09 PM
- Hartmann's Travelers Guide to Mars - Donald - 11/26/2003 4:04:24 PM
  - Look's Great! - Mark Eby - 11/29/2003 12:38:31 AM
- re: Bill Hartmann (Scientist, textbook/fiction Author, & Painter) - JonClarke - 11/26/2003 5:49:48 AM
  - Obnoxiously... - BRFelix - 11/27/2003 5:12:54 PM
    - Obnoxiously is right. - et - 11/28/2003 6:48:09 PM
      - Collapse, impact or something else? - BRFelix - 12/1/2003 2:23:55 PM
        
        Secondary Craters - Nick Hoffman - 12/1/2003 9:54:49 PM
        
        Here's a case for impact. - et - 12/1/2003 8:05:00 PM
        
        The secondary argument - BRFelix - 12/2/2003 12:27:38 AM
        
        re: The secondary argument - Nick Hoffman - 12/2/2003 8:04:58 AM
        
        Love that MOLA! - BRFelix - 12/3/2003 12:50:50 AM
        
        re: Love that MOLA! - et - 12/3/2003 8:37:37 PM
        
        Oh sorry! - BRFelix - 12/4/2003 8:25:24 PM
        
        re: Oh sorry! - JonClarke - 12/5/2003 12:14:05 AM
        
        What is it.... - BRFelix - 12/5/2003 4:32:41 AM
        
        re: What is it.... - JonClarke - 12/6/2003 2:49:06 AM
        
        I'm sure - BRFelix - 12/6/2003 5:56:52 PM
        
        re: I'm sure - JonClarke - 12/7/2003 3:26:49 AM
        
        re: Ground truth: the solution! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/6/2003 10:39:57 AM
        
        re: The secondary argument - JonClarke - 12/2/2003 4:29:25 AM
    - re: Obnoxiously... - JonClarke - 11/28/2003 5:45:18 AM
      - What happens rarely - BRFelix - 12/1/2003 2:26:49 PM
        
        re: What happens rarely - JonClarke - 12/2/2003 4:25:15 AM
        
        re: What happens rarely - BRFElix - 12/5/2003 2:24:45 PM
  - Answer Is Probably Related To Location - Mark Eby - 11/26/2003 5:04:07 PM
    - re: Answer Is Probably Related To Location - JonClarke - 11/26/2003 9:54:32 PM
  - re: Bill Hartmann (Scientist, textbook/fiction Author, & Painter) - Chris Vancil - 11/26/2003 10:12:42 AM
    - Atmosphere as filter, and landing site predictions... - Nick Hoffman - 11/26/2003 7:32:27 PM
      - re: Atmosphere as filter, and landing site predictions... - DTB - 11/28/2003 10:14:30 PM
        
        re: Atmosphere as filter, and landing site predictions... - Nick Hoffman - 11/29/2003 1:53:06 PM
        
        re: 2100m rim visible for ~100km? - DTB - 11/30/2003 2:55:23 AM
      - crater sizes - JonClarke - 11/27/2003 11:01:54 PM
        
        re: crater sizes - Nick Hoffman - 11/28/2003 1:22:13 AM
        
        re: crater sizes - JonClarke - 11/28/2003 3:15:53 AM
      - re: Atmosphere as filter, and landing site predictions... - JonClarke - 11/26/2003 9:51:15 PM
  - re: craters - Raoul - 11/26/2003 6:32:13 AM
    - re: craters - JonClarke - 11/26/2003 10:33:51 AM
      - I'm not seeing the small craters - pwokenyaw - 11/29/2003 7:47:15 PM
        
        re: I'm not seeing the small craters - Chris Vancil - 11/29/2003 9:20:51 PM
        
        thanks! the second photo is especially clear to me. n/t (n/t) - pwokenyaw - 11/30/2003 11:48:43 PM
      - re: craters - Raoul - 11/26/2003 5:02:50 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (52 posts)