Current Events » in reply to Day-Glo fish prohibited in California

The whole thread (16 posts)

• Day-Glo fish prohibited in California - Tom Brosz - 12/4/2003 4:48:15 PM
  • It simply undescores Chrichton's interesting observation. (n/t) - ebnelson - 12/5/2003 1:47:07 PM
  • Never forget kudzu - Larry J - 12/4/2003 6:18:54 PM
    • re: Never forget kudzu - Tom Brosz - 12/4/2003 11:35:34 PM
      • You ain't seen nothing yet. - Lee - 12/5/2003 2:23:11 AM
        • I think it'll be sooner rather than later. - Lee - 12/5/2003 10:23:17 PM
          • The smart ones will keep their mouths shut about it. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/6/2003 4:04:51 AM
            • Until their numbers become large enough. - Lee - 12/6/2003 7:23:14 AM
              • How many would that be? Surely more than 4 million. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 12/6/2003 12:48:20 PM
                • Oh at least several hundred - Lee - 12/7/2003 1:47:34 AM
                  • "Breeding", eh? - Mary Anne - 12/7/2003 6:22:26 PM
                    • Gattica - FrankC - 12/8/2003 6:34:38 PM
                    • Wouldn't be a problem. - Lee - 12/8/2003 6:22:33 AM
                • Watch out for the ones wearing hats to hide the tendrils in their hair... (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/7/2003 1:35:59 AM
          • Should be under Fox's post. (n/t) - Lee - 12/6/2003 1:54:36 AM
        • re: You ain't seen nothing yet. - Fox - 12/5/2003 6:33:53 PM