Apparent current liberal definition of "international support:" the support of France, Russia and Germany. Apparently nations like Britain, Italy, Australia, Japan, Spain, Turkey, Portugal, most of Eastern Europe, and many others somehow miss the definition of "international."

We have more countries supporting our efforts in Iraq than Clinton had for his "multilateral" Bosnia effort. Count them.

It amazes me that people are still getting away with this "unilateral" crap.

And apparently "unilateral" is okay if we are saving people from being killed by a tyrant. Wait...how's that again? Everybody would have waved the banner for war on Iraq if Bush had done it to save the Kurds, Shiites, and Marsh Arabs? Yeah, right.

And just one more question: If Clinton's America was viewed as the Big Friendly Giant (BFG), why was al Qaeda planning to plow airplanes into our buildings while he was still President? Why did they blow up the basement of the WTC, and bomb our ships and embassies during his administration? Could it be that who was the president didn't really make much difference to people who hated America and the West for its very existence?

To listen to you, one would think that Islamic terrorism had been an unknown phenomenon until Bush was elected. The other people who hate us now are mostly the same squawking European and American leftists and other radicals who have hated us all along.