Update on NYT, etc. 'coverage' of Iraqi anti-terror protests

Current Events » in reply to How the media is covering Iraq

p — 12/11/2003 8:11:44 PM (archived)

Clearly, had the massive protest been against GWB's policies it would be featured across the mainstream media again and again. Their perfunctory mention buried within other stories speaks volumes about the editors' agenda - let no good about reconstruction be emphasized.

Instapundit has been great tracking this stuff along with Andrew Sullivan.

The whole thread (13 posts)

How the media is covering Iraq - Tom Brosz - 12/11/2003 1:08:29 AM
- NYT mentions protests in another story... - Tom Brosz - 12/13/2003 1:34:50 AM
- Cartoon - Tom Brosz - 12/12/2003 9:27:23 AM
  - re: Cartoon - Betsy - 12/12/2003 8:44:33 PM
- Update on NYT, etc. 'coverage' of Iraqi anti-terror protests - p - 12/11/2003 8:11:44 PM
  - When caught in a lie, ignore it, backtrack, change criteria and apply "what ifs" (n/t) - Tony - 12/11/2003 8:24:32 PM
    - He's right. You're not. - Tom Brosz - 12/11/2003 10:40:37 PM
      - Oh dear....... - Tony - 12/12/2003 3:11:57 PM
        
        Coverage - Tom Brosz - 12/12/2003 9:21:47 PM
        
        Oops. Forgot Philly front page link. - Tom Brosz - 12/12/2003 9:23:20 PM
      - The left's self-induced blindness on Iraq is entertaining. - ebnelson - 12/12/2003 2:08:59 PM
- Pardon my trivial nitpicking: How the media ARE covering Iraq - David F Mayer - 12/11/2003 11:08:19 AM
  - *sigh* correction noted. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/11/2003 4:19:24 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)