Man rate a nuclear reactor for space?

Space/Science » in reply to ISS inclination & VASIMR

Old NASA Thought Pattern — 1/16/2004 4:54:25 PM (archived)

You must be crazy.

remember the ISS had to be built with de-orbit in mind because it will be worthless space junk just like the MIR was in a few years...

The cost of recycling and renovation would be to great for anything but de-orbit...

OLD NASA THOUGHT PATTERN

The whole thread (16 posts)

Chart on NASA budget plan - Tom Brosz - 1/15/2004 8:20:00 AM
- re: Chart on NASA budget plan - Motie - 1/31/2004 11:10:27 PM
- My letter to andrew sullivan; It's time for folks to WRITE - phil - 1/15/2004 8:03:20 PM
- I like that the CEV operational costs are about 1/4 the shuttles' - Tony - 1/15/2004 6:21:53 PM
  - Yeah, I remember the operating costs they promised for the Shuttle, too. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/15/2004 8:17:45 PM
- Good news and bad news - Gary - 1/15/2004 5:12:17 PM
  - re: Good news and bad news - gbaikie - 1/15/2004 7:17:17 PM
  - re: Good news and bad news - Larry J - 1/15/2004 5:31:09 PM
    - ISS inclination & VASIMR - phil - 1/15/2004 6:52:09 PM
      - Man rate a nuclear reactor for space? - Old NASA Thought Pattern - 1/16/2004 4:54:25 PM
        
        re: Man rate a nuclear reactor for space? Yes - phil - 1/16/2004 5:14:31 PM
        
        re: Man rate a nuclear reactor for space? Yes - Jack - 1/22/2004 1:22:17 PM
- re: Chart on NASA budget plan - Larry J - 1/15/2004 4:29:22 PM
  - Andrew Sullivan - phil - 1/15/2004 6:28:58 PM
- That's a great chart. - Scott Evil - 1/15/2004 3:52:50 PM
- Of course, sticking to the plan will be another matter... - Tom Brosz - 1/15/2004 8:24:48 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)