Space/Science » in reply to Or perhaps mud.

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Martian Soil in 3-D - SteveS - 1/17/2004 1:49:54 AM
  • Bad link see Gary's post. Damn, I've been striking out on linking (n/t) - SteveS - 1/17/2004 1:48:54 PM
  • Or perhaps mud. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/17/2004 6:26:33 AM
    • Its not mud - Donald - 1/17/2004 2:17:28 PM
  • It's not mud - Gary - 1/17/2004 3:52:37 AM
    • Opinion - Nick Hoffman - 1/17/2004 4:41:27 AM
      • re: Opinion - Marcia - 1/17/2004 6:49:11 PM
      • Bull dust with a static charge - Gary - 1/17/2004 5:07:16 AM
        • Gary - Donald - 1/17/2004 2:36:23 PM
          • I've always wanted to hear that - Gary - 1/17/2004 6:19:30 PM
            • The Kelso Dunes of California - Donald - 1/17/2004 9:16:39 PM
          • No it LOOKS wet and cohesive, beneath a thin surface coating. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 1/17/2004 3:15:00 PM
            • Your confused Robert - Donald - 1/17/2004 4:14:09 PM
              • In order to protect their beliefs, people have to deny what they see. - Robert Clark - 1/17/2004 9:05:32 PM
                • In order to protect their delusions, people have to deny the FACTS! - R.L. - 1/18/2004 1:56:03 AM
              • Polly is more than confused...... (crackers?) (n/t) - Gary - 1/17/2004 6:12:07 PM
                • The story is told ... - Robert Clark - 1/17/2004 9:08:22 PM
      • It appears to be... - Donald - 1/17/2004 5:01:07 AM