All I asked was for you to tell us what you or some credible source consider as "rich" or "wealthy". The idea is that we would understand your frame of reference when using the terms. These definitions would be helpful in discussing your assertions about "tax cuts for the wealthy." If economics is as scientific as you claim, it would seem reasonable to believe that it has precise definitions for such concepts as "rich." It appears you're unwilling or unable to give your definitions for those terms, ultimately rendering them meaningless in this conversation.
The rest of your post was meerly a lot of words signifying nothing. Oh, I'm still waiting for a list of countries who let economists run their economy and whose economies are doing better than the US.
Current Events » in reply to a pretty silly argument
Yes, you do offer a pretty silly argument
The whole thread (23 posts)
- Tax cuts...the second wave
- so some wealthy people got large tax cuts and like them. This is news? Where are the screams of pleasure from the Joe Sixpack level? (n/t)