Sadam (misinformed):"WE have WMD weapons."
Bush (misinformed):"They have WMD weapons."
This is the old adage that gossip brings. Like cops snickering about a bad guy down the block they want to get. Who cares if they don't have any EVIDENCE? They're going to get him one way or another.
And this is why we have the rule of LAW.
And this was why so many people were against our going in.
So Bush (the Texan) doesn't need law OR evidence now?
And we just PARDON his ill-informed advisors along the way?
And THIS is why we started a pre-emptive war, not only on faulty intelligence but faulty REASONING?
C'mon guys, get a grip! Where are your critical thinking skills, you Bush apologists??
Current Events » in reply to A Flawed Argument In the Case for War
He said, she said........
The whole thread (38 posts)
- Kay: Intel Problems Hurt U.S. Credibility
- As long as the credibity of our ability to make war is there, the rest does not matter.
- The word parsing you guys do with Kay makes clinton so proud
- A Flawed Argument In the Case for War
- You don't need a reason to depose a scumball like Saddam Hussein, just an excuse. And ANY excuse will do. (n/t)
- He said, she said........
- This cartoon says it all
