re: dont think so

Current Events » in reply to dont think so

re: dont think so

Tom Brosz — 2/12/2004 6:07:32 AM (archived)

Okay, if the new adjustments "decreased...employment by 409,000," what was the number before the decrease?

It still doesn't make sense to me yet either way.

The whole thread (15 posts)

Joint Economic Committee report on the economy - Tom Brosz - 2/11/2004 10:21:03 PM
- The payroll and household surveys measure different things - Larry J - 2/11/2004 10:54:13 PM
  - Gues which number has been reported by the press since Moses? - Tony - 2/12/2004 2:10:28 AM
    - re: Guess which number - Tom Brosz - 2/12/2004 3:37:50 AM
      - A Ha! Extra half million jobs my bum! - Tony - 2/12/2004 4:52:52 AM
        
        You might want to look at that more closely - Tom Brosz - 2/12/2004 5:27:32 AM
        
        dont think so - Tony - 2/12/2004 5:54:16 AM
        
        re: dont think so - Tom Brosz - 2/12/2004 6:07:32 AM
        
        Tom's right - Tony - 2/12/2004 3:43:52 PM
        
        re: Right? Who knows? - Tom Brosz - 2/12/2004 5:18:43 PM
    - Tony's right... - Tom Brosz - 2/12/2004 3:29:40 AM
      - Go back to my first post on this thread - Larry J - 2/12/2004 2:24:45 PM
        
        Go back to MY first post on this thread - Tony - 2/12/2004 4:26:36 PM
      - re: Tony's right... - Tony - 2/12/2004 4:43:04 AM
  - re: The payroll and household surveys measure different things - gbaikie - 2/12/2004 1:14:47 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)