Wouldn't be the first time. Here, allow me to site some instances where this flawed scientific BS fluorishes:

Cosmology (specifically, the big bang theory of origin to the universe as well as many other hare-brained string theory notions)
Healthcare:
Cancer treatment (chemotherapy is a sanitary modern day bloodletting)
Life extension and the entire field of cryogenics.
Cloning (Clones are genetically inferior and always will be, despite many who dream of animal and human clones emerging everywhere earning tons of money for their patented processes)


Do you think my argument is that science is never wrong? Can you read? Go back and read what I said.

Your claims about Chemotherapy and cloning are apocryphal at best, and I for damn sure don't value your opinion on Cosmology over peer-reviewed experts in the field.

"Climatology is a key example. These folks can't even accurately predict the weather in the next few hours but they are supposed to be able to tell us about global warming and its causes? "

Ooh. Now there is a stinging criticism! There goes that field of study, fallen to the rapier of your piercing insight!

Point of fact, I can't pin down when the next decay of an atom will happen, but given a few million atoms of an isotope, I can give you the exact femto second when exactly half of them will have decayed.

Your argument is patently absurd, uninformed and naive.

"The peer review process is itself tainted by the forums which host it and facilitate it. From online peer review to publications which accept and seek out advertising dollars (aka AAAS' Science magazine) the peer review process itself is seldom unbiased. It's a start, but generally much good science is buried and underreported while much iffy science is glorified and pursued due to the political agenda of the publications, various educational and research institutions as well as corporate interests."

And you have published how much? All of this is your unsubstantiated, IGNORANT claims- you have no firsthand experience of what you speak, not even anything to point to to back you up.

If you publish patent BS, you will be found out and exposed. Your career will end, you will never publish again. Thats how it goes.

"These things must be suppressed, underreported and if at all possible stillborn at birth! Cars are the enemy of the hysterical political left and are the embodied symbol of capitalism. They simply cannot risk turning car-drivers into planet ecosystem savers - why that would NEVER do! Cars are the enemy! SUVs are commiting a "crime against humanity" (nope I didn't make that phrase up, it is Bowsers;-) "

And exactly where and WHAT does this have to do with the political bias of climate models? You are completely out in left field. I don't give a flying rat fink what you drive, and frankly made no comments about it. Shall we move onto the next Red Herring? OOhh! Lets talk about vorticies!

"Global warming is a tool used by leftists to achieve their political agenda and try to pretend such an agenda is scientifically driven.
"

What a bullshit handwave pontification. I suppose I should believe it because you say so?

"That is the bottomline."

No, its the bottom of the barrel.

and this:

"Taking away or taxing American's cars, banishing industry and creating mass conformity supported and enforced by law is the goal of these modern day Bolsheviks on the fringes of society. Usually they are supported by the poor and disillusioned who buy into this garbage and can then try and justify their jealousies and petty emotions saying they are really concerned for the planet. On the other side of the coin they are supported by the rich and jaded who also would like some elixir of social revolution to satiate their guilt. "

hahahahahaha!!! LOLOLOLOL. You outta get paid for this. Nope, you have no political bias, certainly not compared to them that LIBral sci--eeen--tists

Davin L.