Do you even know the meaning of "ad hominem"?
I'm betting you don't, and you think that just plain personal attacks ARE REALLY a part of legitimate debate and do prove something. That would help me to understand you a bit better.
I mean, you correctly asked for citations. I gave 'em, followed up with my evaluation of those circumstances. Followed up, unwisely, with an insult. At least there was the information you requested.
And in my opinion, your follow-up has no information on the issue.
As I'm sure you know, the insults we sling back and forth don't do much but validate our opinions of each other.
Anyway, as a favor, give it a try, will you? What does "ad hominem" mean, and how does it contribute to discussion of an issue?
Thanks.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to Once again your powers of deep analysis proves
Ed, a favor, please.
The whole thread (27 posts)
- Anybody know what John Kerry's biggest fear should be right now?
- Frankly, I cant believe there are that many bush supporters. (n/t)
- The Republicans funded Nader in 2000 - wonder what they're giving him now?
