That capacity would be great. A lot of fun, really.
I don't know, but I'd wonder if that capability would be as necessary for the mission as some other use of the weight and power.
And maybe they upgraded the CCDs instead, relying on digital magnification later.
It also seems to me that what with all the moving parts and the computers to run them, they've been absolutely incredibly lucky radiation hasn't knocked something out or seriously degraded the performance. I'm sort of amazed that the only real losses are of time and have been due to human error.
Mars, so far, has been friendly. But we seem to be the first visitor to not make a great big SPLAT when we came.
Arf
Space/Science » in reply to Anybody know why they didn't put some kind of telescopic lens attachments on the panoramic camera?
Mission?
The whole thread (8 posts)
- Anybody know why they didn't put some kind of telescopic lens attachments on the panoramic camera?
- A good idea for the next mission (n/t)
- Mission?
- re: Anybody know why they didn't put some kind of telescopic lens attachments on the panoramic camera?
- You might also consider that they are on a rover and if an object looks interesting enough they could just drive over and look at it close-up. (n/t)
