re: True, but some objects, like the backshell, look about four days slow drive away.

Space/Science » in reply to True, but some objects, like the backshell, look about four days slow drive away.

PB — 3/7/2004 4:34:35 AM (archived)

I hope that you are right - that they get up to 100+ m on the Meridiani plain. I heard weeks ago about "pedal to the metal" software that would be uploaded for longer drives.

The whole thread (8 posts)

Anybody know why they didn't put some kind of telescopic lens attachments on the panoramic camera? - Tom Brosz - 3/6/2004 6:49:48 PM
- A good idea for the next mission (n/t) - David F Mayer - 3/7/2004 4:50:08 AM
- Mission? - Bowser - 3/6/2004 7:57:28 PM
- re: Anybody know why they didn't put some kind of telescopic lens attachments on the panoramic camera? - DavidV - 3/6/2004 7:53:13 PM
  - You might also consider that they are on a rover and if an object looks interesting enough they could just drive over and look at it close-up. (n/t) - Delbert - 3/6/2004 9:06:39 PM
    - re: You might also consider that they are on a rover and if an object looks interesting enough they could just drive over and look at it close-up. - AllenC - 3/7/2004 6:13:48 AM
    - True, but some objects, like the backshell, look about four days slow drive away. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/6/2004 10:02:50 PM
      - re: True, but some objects, like the backshell, look about four days slow drive away. - PB - 3/7/2004 4:34:35 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (8 posts)