yes, given likely relative hardness, must be a 'glitch'. – Space/Science – HabitableZone

Space/Science

Recent posts

Recent posts

Fewer Transient Alerts coming BuckGalaxy November 2, 2026 5:48 pm (Space/Science)
This report from Congress came out last week... podrock November 1, 2026 11:22 pm (Current Events)
Happy Halloween podrock October 31, 2026 3:03 am (Off Topic)
Expect one hell of a recession/depression in 2027 Arrell October 31, 2026 1:16 am (Current Events)
Next week will get ugly.... Arrell October 30, 2026 2:02 pm (Current Events)
Sir Patrick Stewart. podrock October 30, 2026 11:52 am (Off Topic)
Bernie Taupin. A great interview podrock October 30, 2026 3:05 am (Off Topic)
A new Dwarf Planet? Arrell October 30, 2026 12:49 am (Space/Science)
John Wheeler's philosophy: "Beyond the Black Hole" RL October 17, 2025 5:00 am (Space/Science)
"Engage!" BuckGalaxy October 29, 2026 10:58 pm (Off Topic)

On this day in Space/Science

1 year ago (that week) New Glenn set for its second launch on November 9 7 replies · Nov 5, 2025
5 years ago (that week) ZEISS Mineralogic 3D 1 reply · Nov 3, 2021
10 years ago (that week) CO2 to ethanol 0 replies · Nov 1, 2016

Log in
Register

Space/Science » in reply to I was under the impression they just missed

yes, given likely relative hardness, must be a 'glitch'.

jms — 3/9/2004 5:27:24 AM (archived)

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (9 posts)

Hard rock on Mars? - Robert Clark - 3/8/2004 11:05:44 PM
- Grind motor stalled - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 5:58:02 AM
- gonna have to think 'bout this... - jms - 3/9/2004 3:32:08 AM
  - I was under the impression they just missed - Buck Galaxy - 3/9/2004 4:17:30 AM
    - yes, given likely relative hardness, must be a 'glitch'. (n/t) - jms - 3/9/2004 5:27:24 AM
- re: Hard rock on Mars? - Marcia - 3/8/2004 11:42:49 PM
  - re: Sorry, that first image... - Marcia - 3/8/2004 11:46:56 PM
    - image orientation - PB - 3/9/2004 2:55:55 PM
      - re: image orientation - Marcia - 3/9/2004 3:20:46 PM

HabitableZone — be civil, or at least entertaining.