re: image orientation

Space/Science » in reply to image orientation

Marcia — 3/9/2004 3:20:46 PM (archived)

Yes, PB. :)

Apparently, the first MI image I posted:

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/043/1M132015283EFF05A6P2952M2M1-BR.JPG

... has been flipped 180 here:

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040308a/1M132015283EFF05A6P2952M2M1-B043R1_br.jpg

I found it posted here: Last image at the bottom.

That last MI one looks to be 'more' correct since the light source is coming from above. The lines/cleavage coincide with the other images I posted, including the larger field of view you get from the FrontHaz image. It looks virtually untouched by the RAT in that last one. We'll soon find out more.

The whole thread (9 posts)

Hard rock on Mars? - Robert Clark - 3/8/2004 11:05:44 PM
- Grind motor stalled - Tom Brosz - 3/9/2004 5:58:02 AM
- gonna have to think 'bout this... - jms - 3/9/2004 3:32:08 AM
  - I was under the impression they just missed - Buck Galaxy - 3/9/2004 4:17:30 AM
    - yes, given likely relative hardness, must be a 'glitch'. (n/t) - jms - 3/9/2004 5:27:24 AM
- re: Hard rock on Mars? - Marcia - 3/8/2004 11:42:49 PM
  - re: Sorry, that first image... - Marcia - 3/8/2004 11:46:56 PM
    - image orientation - PB - 3/9/2004 2:55:55 PM
      - re: image orientation - Marcia - 3/9/2004 3:20:46 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (9 posts)