Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re: It should have survived peaked heating

re: It should have survived peaked heating

Doug said:

>Sound like you have a few events backwards. The heatshield jetison was
>after the pilot chute deployment, and during the activity of falling from the
>back shell and deploying the main chute.

I'm aware of that. I was describing different scenarios, not necessarily in sequence. The G-sensor would have initiated the sequence.

>They certainly did not screw up the entry vector - the same engineers who
>put MEX into an exact corridor for the MOI burn put that same spacecraft on
>the exact corridor for B2 entry.

I have no doubt that the engineers who controlled Mars Express (MEX) knew what they were doing. Unlike Beagle-2, Mars Express has been a complete success. In all likelyhood it was MEX engineers who managed Beagle-2's entry vector and Beagle-2 entered the atmosphere exactly where it was supposed to. However it is also possible that MEX simply flew a predefined trajectory and made no allowance for Beagle-2 (it was a piggyback payload). It might have been up to Beagle-2's engineers to say "jettison us here". Under that scenario, it is not unreasonable to suppose that the entry vector was incorrect.

Gary

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (6 posts)