re: Pillinger's Folly

Space/Science » in reply to Pillinger's Folly

Robert Clark — 3/17/2004 4:24:47 PM (archived)

Sounds as harsh as some of the criticism leveled at NASA after Mars Observer, Mars Polar Lander and Mars Climate Orbiter.
I guess we should therefore never support NASA again ...

Bob Clark

The whole thread (12 posts)

Pillinger's Folly - Donald - 3/17/2004 5:18:34 AM
- re: Pillinger's Folly - Robert Clark - 3/17/2004 4:24:47 PM
- re: Pillinger's Folly - Doug Ellison - 3/17/2004 8:48:19 AM
  - re: Pillinger's Folly - Donald - 3/17/2004 3:20:27 PM
    - re: Pillinger's Folly - Doug - 3/17/2004 7:05:45 PM
      - re: Mobility - DavidV - 3/18/2004 12:46:30 AM
      - i'm with you - alcaray - 3/17/2004 7:34:25 PM
        
        Shouldn't ESA / the U.K. offer competitive prizes so that if Pillinger's the best, he can prevail? - ~tax leech - 3/17/2004 8:04:09 PM
        
        If ESA and/or UK want to spend their money that way, it is fine with me - alcaray - 3/17/2004 9:54:19 PM
        
        re: If ESA and/or UK want to spend their money that way, it is fine with me - Doug - 3/17/2004 10:03:07 PM
        
        Well, all the best to you guys! - alcaray - 3/17/2004 10:12:23 PM
  - NASA didn't hype X-33 or ISS? How about the '99 Mars Polar Lander or Climate Orbiter? - ~tax leech - 3/17/2004 1:29:55 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (12 posts)