re: In other words . . .

Current Events » in reply to You don't like those words? I'll try again.

D. spires — 3/27/2004 5:54:44 PM (archived)

Bush is at least as good as Clinton.

I personally think him far better, simply because the war was taken to the enemy camps. This is something a tree-hugging, dope-smoking draft dodger might have a lot of difficulty bringing himself to do, whereas an alcoholic, coke-snorting reservist could readily realize a desperate need for.

Thank you,
Dan

The whole thread (10 posts)

"...most of the strategies approved by high-level Bush officials on Sept. 4 and Sept. 10, 2001, were nearly identical in thrust to the policies pursued by the Clinton team." - Bowser - 3/27/2004 5:16:14 PM
- re: In other words . . . - D. Spires - 3/27/2004 5:21:24 PM
  - You don't like those words? I'll try again. - Bowser - 3/27/2004 5:45:06 PM
    - re: In other words . . . - D. spires - 3/27/2004 5:54:44 PM
      - Oh, Dan. For crying out loud! In other words, get serious. - Bowser - 3/27/2004 6:13:52 PM
        
        re: Oh, I can't be serious when I'm typing to you, B . . . - D. Spires - 3/27/2004 6:46:55 PM
        
        re: In other words, get serious. - Tom Brosz - 3/27/2004 6:38:09 PM
        
        re:Face it you and the GOP are attacking a honest man...is this moral? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 3/28/2004 7:48:47 PM
        
        And another dishonesty recycled from the 'O'Spin Factor' nonsense - Davin L. - 3/28/2004 7:21:21 AM
        
        re: In other words, get serious. - Davin L. - 3/28/2004 7:16:39 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (10 posts)