re: Are you TRYING to humiliate yourself?

Space/Science » in reply to Are you TRYING to humiliate yourself?

re: Are you TRYING to humiliate yourself?

gbaikie — 4/27/2004 10:03:57 AM (archived)

I said: The affect of human activity on Global temperatures is unknown.

RL said: "BULLSHIT you know I posted the ice core data showing the CO2 increase during the industrial years... "

I wasn't making a claim about what you had or had not posted. What is a fact is that Global temperature have been significantly higher than present and the CO2 content in the past has been significantly higher than present. What is also true is that a rise in global temperature, appears occur prior to rises in CO2 global CO2 content. What is also known is Global temperatures have been rising since the end of the Little Ice Age- therefore it follows that from around 1600's onward one would expect a rising Global CO2 content due to rising Global temperature. It seems likely that Humans have added to this CO2 content, but as I said "The affect of human activity on Global temperatures is unknown."

The whole thread (28 posts)

Bush muzzles NASA regarding FOX'S new climate-chanve movie. - Astro - 4/25/2004 1:33:44 PM
- FOX'S new climate-change movie. - Tom Brosz - 4/25/2004 6:49:29 PM
  - Re: Use of scientifically-inaccurate entertainment for political purposes - Tom Brosz - 4/28/2004 2:22:52 AM
  - Bad Science: entertainment, or instruction by fear? - jms - 4/27/2004 1:11:49 AM
    - btw . . . brilliant, jms! - Fox - 4/30/2004 1:12:32 AM
    - re: Bad Science: entertainment, or instruction by fear? - Larry J - 4/27/2004 7:44:17 PM
    - re: Bad Science: entertainment, or instruction by fear? - gbaikie - 4/27/2004 7:06:32 PM
      - I'm glad to discover I was misled by the media. (n/t) - jms - 4/27/2004 10:21:50 PM
  - China Syndrome vs. Three Mile Island - Dave M - 4/26/2004 5:06:53 PM
  - China Syndrome vs. Three Mile Island - Dave M - 4/26/2004 5:06:38 PM
    - And, while we're speculating . . . - Fox - 4/30/2004 1:37:38 AM
    - Bingo! (n/t) - Fox - 4/28/2004 2:03:54 AM
  - A different take - R.L. - 4/26/2004 12:21:15 AM
    - re: A different take - gbaikie - 4/26/2004 11:07:44 AM
      - Are you TRYING to humiliate yourself? - R.L. - 4/27/2004 4:36:15 AM
        
        re: Are you TRYING to humiliate yourself? - gbaikie - 4/27/2004 10:03:57 AM
    - Yet another: "reverse psychology" - Fox - 4/26/2004 2:03:26 AM
      - (What the heck was that all about? R. L., I mean.) (n/t) - Bowser - 4/26/2004 2:24:49 AM
  - Do you realize the implications of that post? - Bowser - 4/25/2004 8:14:52 PM
    - re: Do you realize that the New York Times is, as usual, entirely full of crap? - Tom Brosz - 4/25/2004 9:54:57 PM
      - No. The implications of what YOU said. Do you realize those? (n/t) - Bowser - 4/25/2004 10:32:11 PM
        
        Yes, I said movies like this can have a political impact, and have in the past. You got a problem with that? - Tom Brosz - 4/25/2004 11:32:37 PM
        
        Slick Willy couldn't have done it better. - Bowser - 4/25/2004 11:59:29 PM
        
        Talking to a wall again. - Tom Brosz - 4/26/2004 4:26:01 AM
        
        Ho hum. "Slick Willy couldn't have - - - - - " See above. (n/t) - Bowser - 4/26/2004 4:57:41 AM
        
        re: Yeah, right. - Tom Brosz - 4/26/2004 3:19:35 PM
        
        re: Yeah, right.... right.... - Nick Hoffman - 4/26/2004 5:10:17 PM
        
        One last try. - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2004 2:34:14 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (28 posts)