Sorry, not nearly good enough.
First of all, it is necessary to predict when earthquakes will NOT happen as well, so that the success matrix can be constructed.
After all, I could predict an earthquake for every place on Earth, on every day in the future, and would have a 100% rate of successful predictions, that is to say, every earthquake that actually happened would have been predicted (number 3 and 4 would never occur).
There are 4 slots in the success matrix.
1 , 2
3 , 4
1. Predicted and happened
2. Predicted and failed to happen
3. Not predicted and happened
4. Not predicted and failed to happen
Numbers 1 & 2 above, without numbers 3 & 4 are completely meaningless.
I will believe in earthquake prediction after somebody gets a record where the sum of the percentages in numbers 1 & 4 above greatly exceed the sum of the percentages in 2 & 3 over a period of at least a decade and covering a large part of the Earth. This has never happened.
I am not holding my breath, either.
Space/Science » in reply to Some geophysicist from UCLA claims there will be a 6.4 magnitude earthquake in Southern-California by September/05/2004.
"This has all happened before. It will all happen again. This time, it happened to ..." J M Barrie.-- Peter Pan
The whole thread (12 posts)
- Some geophysicist from UCLA claims there will be a 6.4 magnitude earthquake in Southern-California by September/05/2004.
- "This has all happened before. It will all happen again. This time, it happened to ..." J M Barrie.-- Peter Pan
- So far, a 4.4
- A similar prediction was made back in the early 90s about the New Madrid fault.
- That's a rather specific prediction
- re: Some geophysicist from UCLA claims there will be a 6.4 magnitude earthquake in Southern-California by September/05/2004.
- weaving threads together
- One would almost hope it happens.
