You didn't touch the Kay thing with a ten foot pole, but thanks for the vote of confidence :-)
But at this time, I have to ask the ol' Davin question....
Given that the revealing of actual WMDs would change a lot of people's minds about the war, what would it take to either
a) change your mind and be against the invasion
or B) prove to you there were no WMDs in Iraq (prior to invasion)?
I'm figuring a) justified no matter what happens with WMD or to Iraq after we leave and b) bloody difficult to prove a negative.......
Pretty close?