re: This is a fact?

Current Events » in reply to re: This is a fact?

re: This is a fact?

Pete Stanley — 5/13/2004 6:01:40 AM (archived)

I believe the "they" in this passage refers to the numerous non-Iraqis currently fighting against the US in Iraq.

There were no Iraqis involved in the attacks on Manhattan or DC.

I am increasingly convinced this is not the case.

The whole thread (15 posts)

Belmont Club: "Reductio Ad Absurdum" - Tom Brosz - 5/12/2004 5:25:52 PM
- Wretchard is brilliant - Gary - 5/13/2004 6:28:08 AM
- Missing a certain little something, perhaps? (n/t) - Tony - 5/12/2004 6:24:18 PM
  - Aw, crap. - Tom Brosz - 5/12/2004 9:07:27 PM
    - Not equatable - Tony - 5/13/2004 1:46:37 PM
    - re: This is a fact? - Mary Anne - 5/13/2004 12:12:20 AM
      - re: This is a fact? - Pete Stanley - 5/13/2004 6:01:40 AM
        
        Convinced by what evidence? (n/t) - alcaray - 5/13/2004 10:47:32 PM
        
        re: Convinced by what evidence? - Pete Stanley - 5/14/2004 7:34:22 AM
        
        That's not evidence. It is a refutation of evidence to the contrary. - alcaray - 5/14/2004 5:37:12 PM
      - This is a fact - Tom Brosz - 5/13/2004 4:23:16 AM
        
        re: This is a fact - Mary Anne - 5/13/2004 6:52:34 PM
        
        re: This is a fact - Pete Stanley - 5/14/2004 5:12:54 AM
        
        Syria and Iran - Tom Brosz - 5/14/2004 7:19:28 AM
      - re: This is a fact? - gbaikie - 5/13/2004 1:07:36 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)