Current Events » in reply to re: Convinced by what evidence?

The whole thread (15 posts)

• Belmont Club: "Reductio Ad Absurdum" - Tom Brosz - 5/12/2004 5:25:52 PM
  • Wretchard is brilliant - Gary - 5/13/2004 6:28:08 AM
  • Missing a certain little something, perhaps? (n/t) - Tony - 5/12/2004 6:24:18 PM
    • Aw, crap. - Tom Brosz - 5/12/2004 9:07:27 PM
      • Not equatable - Tony - 5/13/2004 1:46:37 PM
      • re: This is a fact? - Mary Anne - 5/13/2004 12:12:20 AM
        • re: This is a fact? - Pete Stanley - 5/13/2004 6:01:40 AM
          • Convinced by what evidence? (n/t) - alcaray - 5/13/2004 10:47:32 PM
            • re: Convinced by what evidence? - Pete Stanley - 5/14/2004 7:34:22 AM
              • That's not evidence. It is a refutation of evidence to the contrary. - alcaray - 5/14/2004 5:37:12 PM
        • This is a fact - Tom Brosz - 5/13/2004 4:23:16 AM
          • re: This is a fact - Mary Anne - 5/13/2004 6:52:34 PM
            • re: This is a fact - Pete Stanley - 5/14/2004 5:12:54 AM
              • Syria and Iran - Tom Brosz - 5/14/2004 7:19:28 AM
        • re: This is a fact? - gbaikie - 5/13/2004 1:07:36 AM