No It doesn't.

Off Topic » in reply to Saddam was worse. That excuses every abuse by Americans.

No It doesn't.

RobVG — 5/13/2004 6:26:48 PM (archived)

I saw the Iraqi ambassador this morning say something to the effect "Saddam is not the yardstick to measure US actions by."

I agree.

But the point of the article is not a direct comparison of the US and Saddam's regime; it clearly shows what the media chooses to invest in.

The whole thread (11 posts)

Media coverage. Typical example. - Tom Brosz - 5/13/2004 4:25:58 PM
- re: Media coverage. Another example. - Tom Brosz - 5/13/2004 6:32:03 PM
- Saddam was worse. That excuses every abuse by Americans. - Bowser - 5/13/2004 6:06:36 PM
  - No It doesn't. - RobVG - 5/13/2004 6:26:48 PM
  - re: Saddam was worse. - Tom Brosz - 5/13/2004 6:21:00 PM
    - 300,000 in mass graves may actually be a serious issue when discussing the rationale for invading a nation - Tony - 5/13/2004 6:51:22 PM
      - re: 300,000 in mass graves may actually be a serious issue when discussing the rationale for invading a nation - Bowser - 5/13/2004 7:49:48 PM
        
        Going to let that post just sit there, like a fish rotting on the beach. Suggest everyone take a look at it. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/13/2004 9:46:15 PM
        
        You can't "answer" it. It's just true. - Bowser - 5/13/2004 11:01:19 PM
        
        re: Yes! - Raoul - 5/14/2004 6:41:06 AM
- Not much on the use of VX in the Jordan attack either. - RobVG - 5/13/2004 5:30:14 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (11 posts)