re: Saddam was worse.
That wasn't the point I was making.
To someone capable of linear thought, 300,000 in mass graves may actually be a serious issue when discussing the rationale for invading a nation, even though that means the loss of some other lives in the short term. And no doubt this is why the subject of the mass graves are avoided by the media, which does not want to publish anything at all that might make the war look like a good idea.
Get it now?