Yes, Bush 41 (not Senior) did call Reagan's economic plan "voodoo economics" during the primaries. Reagan accepted him as VP anyway, and Bush learned how wrong he was. In retrospect, which one had the more successful presidency, Reagan or Bush?
Unfortunately for the Democrats, Kerry was right about Edwards. He's a lightweight who has not seen a single piece of legislation he sponsored make it into law, didn't even bother to show up for the majority of votes for the past couple years (like Kerry), and has no executive or military experience whatsoever. His political resume is so thin that he makes Dan Quayle look substancial by comparison. Kerry was also right about Edwards when he said, "This is not the time for on-the-job training." A Vice President is one heartbeat away from being President, and Edwards is even less qualified than Kerry for the job.
Current Events » in reply to re: Kerry on Edwards...
re: Kerry on Edwards...
The whole thread (36 posts)
- Kerry picks Edwards as VP candidate
- Get a good look at Kerry while you can...
- But, but, but does Edwards have 'gravitas'?
- But, but, but does Edwards have 'gravitas'?
- Edwards is even less qualified to be VP than Dan Quayle...
- Kerry should have balanced the ticket
- Dumb and dumbererer
- Edwards is even less qualified to be VP than Dan Quayle...
- Oops!
- Hillary? Not me.
- Kerry on Edwards...
