Actually, that scenario used to be considered much more likely than what actually happened.

Current Events » in reply to These scenarios bring up the scariest possibility and perhaps our greatest vulnerability

Tom Brosz — 7/12/2004 5:02:45 AM (archived)

It was not unknown even before 9/11 to keep small aircraft out of "no fly zones" for certain events. Someone crashed a small plane at the White House in 1994, for which there was hell to pay in the security department.

The whole thread (8 posts)

Vindication again - S - 7/11/2004 8:04:37 PM
- Interesting news - Buck Galaxy - 7/12/2004 7:19:13 AM
- You base this scenario on what previous response to a hijacking? - RobVG - 7/12/2004 1:12:45 AM
- An amazing thought - FrankC - 7/11/2004 11:53:14 PM
  - These scenarios bring up the scariest possibility and perhaps our greatest vulnerability - m - 7/12/2004 1:21:02 AM
    - re: These scenarios bring up the scariest possibility and perhaps our greatest vulnerability - Larry J - 7/12/2004 6:41:41 PM
    - Actually, that scenario used to be considered much more likely than what actually happened. - Tom Brosz - 7/12/2004 5:02:45 AM
    - I think S would suggest the use of SAMs at public events. (n/t) - RobVG - 7/12/2004 1:39:55 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (8 posts)