Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to So why not go with the photon rocket option?

Power sources and rocket equation

Hi Lee

Simply, a rocket has to push itself and the fuel it will need for the trip. You very rapidly run up a huge mass budget. Also a photon rocket needs an extreme energy source for miniscule thrust and its power output has to be insanely high. A thrust of one newton is enough to accelerate a kilogram by a metre per second per second. A photon rocket needs a jet power of 300 million joules for a measly newton - a nuclear reactor with that output would mass ~ 60 - 30 tonnes. And it would need a lot of nuclear fuel and heat radiators massing hundreds of tons. More powerful reactors don't improve things much as the reactor/radiator mass keeps rising with the power output.

Nuclear fuel at most produces ~ 83 terajoules per kilogram when fully burnt up, but converting that to electric power, say, for making photons is only ~ 35 - 60% efficient. Making photons with lasers is inefficient as well, turning ~ 50% of the power input into photons, losing the rest as heat. So about 17.5% - 35% of the fuel's energy becomes photons. Hence there's a lot of fuel wasted with a photon rocket. And you have to push all of it when carrying it on a rocket.

Far, far easier to make bombs with the stuff and toss it out the back to go "bang!", riding the plasma burst with a magnetic field... and even easier to leave it all at home and shot it at the magnetic pusher plate.

Which is where we began this discussion.

Adam

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (12 posts)