re: What would it mean to capture Bin Laden?

Current Events » in reply to What would it mean to capture Bin Laden?

p — 9/6/2004 11:54:18 AM (archived)

Gotta love it. First, Bush gets criticized for NOT capturing OBL and now we see the counterpoint that capturing OBL means little. Nice logic box.

Anyone with any sense knows that Islamic teror does not end with the capture of OBL. It's just been a constant DNC talking pont that Bush has been wasting effort in Iraq rather than focusing on capturing OBL.

The whole thread (8 posts)

What would it mean to capture Bin Laden? - Chris Vancil - 9/6/2004 9:29:18 AM
- Not much. - Tom Brosz - 9/6/2004 3:45:42 PM
  - It might possibly have an impact on al Queda's financing - Larry J - 9/6/2004 8:22:47 PM
    - re: It might possibly have an impact on al Queda's financing - Chris Vancil - 9/6/2004 10:27:02 PM
      - In Other Words - Mark Eby - 9/7/2004 2:10:26 AM
        
        re: In Other Words - Chris Vancil - 9/7/2004 5:36:09 AM
- re: What would it mean to capture Bin Laden? - p - 9/6/2004 11:54:18 AM
  - re: What would it mean to capture Bin Laden? - Chris Vancil - 9/6/2004 10:29:36 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (8 posts)