I didn't say she was lying. I believe she is telling her story to the best of her memory precisely because she is telling statements that seem to counter what she wishes were the facts. I'm saying her memory should not suffice as evidence unless you are willing to accept memory as sufficient in other cases as well. She may well accurately remember disgruntlement with Bush, but the level and the specifics are not necessarily accurate after all these years. She also admits to disliking Bush. You don't think that can shade memories? I know damn well it does. People tend to remember the best of those they like and the worst of those they dislike.
Regards,
Mark
Current Events » in reply to re: Then The Swift Boat Veterans Claims Are True Too
Strawman
The whole thread (30 posts)
- The nail in the coffin of CBS: Killian's secretary says they are forgeries, and she hates W
- she said they accurately reflect the viewpoints of Lt. Col. Killian and documents that would have been in the personal file.
- re: Since even you agree that these are frauds now...Why won't Dan Rather admit it?
- No, the docs are total frauds, and CBS had to have known it at the time.
- Then The Swift Boat Veterans Claims Are True Too
- And she said: “The information (talking of the forged docs) in here was correct, but it was picked up from the real ones,†she said. (n/t)
- she said they accurately reflect the viewpoints of Lt. Col. Killian and documents that would have been in the personal file.
