Ports

Current Events » in reply to Why we are not safer.

Ports

Tom Brosz — 9/16/2004 5:58:37 PM (archived)

This was on the radio this morning. Good news, but what the heck is taking so long?

I know some other ports in the U.S. are set up for scanning. Anybody know how many? They don't like advertising which ports are protected and which aren't.

The whole thread (13 posts)

Why we are not safer. - Chris Vancil - 9/16/2004 6:39:09 AM
- Ports - Tom Brosz - 9/16/2004 5:58:37 PM
  - re: Yes, Ports - Chris Vancil - 9/16/2004 10:11:14 PM
  - re: Ports - REB - 9/16/2004 7:47:48 PM
    - Nuclear detection - Art Martin - 9/17/2004 11:27:28 PM
- Congratulations Chris, you elicited a response from Larry, Curley, and Moe.......... (n/t) - Publius - 9/16/2004 2:11:53 PM
  - re: Yeah and my last name is now word meaning patriot... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/17/2004 7:36:13 AM
  - Heh, heh. And such constructive comments, succinct, pithy even. - Bowser - 9/16/2004 2:36:13 PM
  - Can I be Curley? Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk - REB - 9/16/2004 2:34:41 PM
- re: John Kerry would protect us from cargo ships? - Scott Evil - 9/16/2004 1:15:20 PM
  - re: Yes. He would actually spend money instend of spending words He doesn't have the Neocon's agenda. You don't look to closely at Bush international trade agenda did you..before you posted nonsense? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/16/2004 4:53:35 PM
- Why do you keep spamming what is obviously false? (n/t) - ebnelson - 9/16/2004 12:05:56 PM
  - Because he has nothing else. - REB - 9/16/2004 12:30:30 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)