Ooops - still problems - you're not the only one moving too fast – Space/Science

Ooops - still problems - you're not the only one moving too fast

E.P. Grondine — 9/28/2004 12:12:27 AM (archived)

The first article youn linked to had 690 BC, not 690 AD. (I like to use the more neutral BCE and CE for BC and AD.) It lists Halley at 684 CE (AD).

The second article gives a date of 690 CE (AD) for Halley's, but without citation - no idea where the information came from - it seems to be different than Chinese sources used in first series.

ep

The whole thread (18 posts)

Raoul, your help please, concerning comets - E.P. Grondine - 9/27/2004 8:54:04 PM
- Oooops... - E.P. Grondine - 9/27/2004 9:01:20 PM
  - re: Halley's Comet - Raoul - 9/27/2004 9:07:03 PM
    - re: Sorry....I went too fast - Raoul - 9/27/2004 9:10:57 PM
      - re: However, 4 orbits earlier... - Raoul - 9/27/2004 9:17:56 PM
        
        re: Here - Raoul - 9/27/2004 9:28:31 PM
        
        Thanks! - E.P. Grondine - 9/28/2004 12:02:50 AM
        
        re: Comets - Raoul - 9/28/2004 7:43:10 AM
        
        690 AD, not 690 BC - E.P. Grondine - 9/28/2004 1:59:28 PM
        
        re: 690 AD, - Raoul - 9/28/2004 2:37:32 PM
        
        re: 690 AD, - E.P. Grondine - 9/28/2004 7:07:16 PM
        
        re: re:J'en ai bien peur, en effet:) (n/t) - Raoul - 9/28/2004 9:44:37 PM
        
        pas de responsabilitie, mais avec "thanks" - une autre question - E.P. Grondine - 9/29/2004 12:15:25 AM
        
        re: Encke - Raoul - 9/29/2004 7:42:54 AM
        
        re: Encke - E.P. Grondine - 9/29/2004 2:18:41 PM
        
        re: Encke - Raoul - 9/29/2004 5:13:50 PM
        
        re: Comets - REB - 9/28/2004 1:20:53 PM
        
        Ooops - still problems - you're not the only one moving too fast - E.P. Grondine - 9/28/2004 12:12:27 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (18 posts)