Current Events » in reply to Preferably consistently.

The whole thread (40 posts)

• Party of tolerance update: Demothugs invade and ransack Republican office in Wisconsin - ebnelson - 10/6/2004 8:34:25 PM
  • OK, we have links. - Mary Anne - 10/7/2004 10:48:39 AM
    • So now you blame the victim as well? - ebnelson - 10/7/2004 3:48:18 PM
      • One day you'll learn to read again. - Mary Anne - 10/7/2004 11:52:17 PM
        • It is so obvious that you appreciate Cervantes................n/t (n/t) - Publius - 10/8/2004 8:11:28 PM
      • read it again (n/t) - alcaray - 10/7/2004 4:56:02 PM
        • I did. she blames the dad for the union thug's attack on his daughter. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/7/2004 6:29:50 PM
          • I did not at first comprehend the depth of your misunderstanding - alcaray - 10/7/2004 6:45:22 PM
            • I knew precisely what Mary Anne was referring to - ebnelson - 10/7/2004 9:55:43 PM
              • read the thread. The "demothug" was the son of the "victim". (n/t) - alcaray - 10/7/2004 10:55:07 PM
                • That was a theory. Ever proven? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/8/2004 5:44:06 PM
                  • No more than the West Allis story has been. No police complaint, you see. - Mary Anne - 10/8/2004 9:54:02 PM
    • re: we have links. - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2004 3:36:55 PM
      • If I hadn't witnessed this kind of behavior first-hand, it might not have occurred to me. - Mary Anne - 10/8/2004 12:12:25 AM
      • Skepticism is healthy. Everyone should apply it. (n/t) - alcaray - 10/7/2004 4:57:46 PM
        • Preferably consistently. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2004 5:41:16 PM
          • And who found the link to the Orlando incident? (n/t) - Fox - 10/8/2004 12:48:05 AM
  • Kinda reminds one of the Rs preventing Fla vote counting, doesn't it? - Bowser - 10/7/2004 4:27:35 AM
    • R's were against selective recounting. - REB - 10/7/2004 4:03:59 PM
    • YOu mean where the dems were going to selectively recount only democrat precincts and exclude republican ones? - ebnelson - 10/7/2004 3:47:12 PM
  • Links. - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2004 4:01:47 AM
    • re: The Republican Party of Wisconsin website? - Chris Vancil - 10/7/2004 6:05:00 AM
      • I looked for it there last night and didn't find it - Fox - 10/8/2004 12:57:13 AM
      • A bit more... - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2004 6:24:41 AM
        • This looks like the Orlando incident... - Mary Anne - 10/7/2004 1:12:12 PM
  • Party of Lincoln update: Nelson joins Cheney in distortion and disinformation (n/t) - Fox - 10/7/2004 12:07:18 AM
    • More like, 'democrats seek to rationalize thuggery when it is expedient' (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/7/2004 12:22:52 AM
  • So you guys still claim there's no polarizing of the nation? - Art Martin - 10/6/2004 10:57:33 PM
    • "Pacifist left." Now I've got to clean the Pepsi out of my keyboard again. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2004 3:53:33 AM
      • Just using a label that your bunch has insinuated many times. - Art Martin - 10/7/2004 7:36:45 PM
      • There is such thing as the pacifist left - alcaray - 10/7/2004 5:53:23 PM
    • Yes, yes, blame the victim. The dems are sewing the wind. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/7/2004 12:23:48 AM
      • The way you keep breaking wind, it *needs* sewing. - Fox - 10/8/2004 12:52:15 AM
      • Link first. "Victim" later. - Mary Anne - 10/7/2004 12:43:34 AM
  • re: BTW where is the link. I don't find it in news or with google. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/6/2004 9:43:10 PM
    • search terms: (+milwaukee +republican +graber +"west allis") comes up empty on the incident. - Mary Anne - 10/7/2004 12:38:08 AM
      • I get the feeling searching Snopes is more appropriate - Fox - 10/7/2004 2:06:30 AM
        • I did, however, find this - Fox - 10/7/2004 3:05:51 AM
          • re: I did, however, find this - gbaikie - 10/7/2004 5:47:49 AM
  • re: Ransack? Where was that in the article? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/6/2004 9:31:06 PM