Flame » in reply to Proving a negative?

The whole thread (17 posts)

• Here's a scenario for ya - SteveS - 10/8/2004 1:29:57 AM
  • So you forcibly remove one of the two parties in an arms race - alcaray - 10/8/2004 7:13:31 PM
    • re: gave victory to the one we didn't remove... - Scott Evil - 10/8/2004 10:02:03 PM
    • Would we be better off with both Iran and Iraq with WMD? - SteveS - 10/8/2004 9:12:15 PM
      • re: Would we be better off with both Iran and Iraq with WMD? - Marcia - 10/9/2004 3:46:14 AM
  • re: Any way you look at it, the whole region is better off now. - Scott Evil - 10/8/2004 4:22:23 PM
    • The whole region is better off now. - SteveS - 10/8/2004 9:22:30 PM
      • re: Justifying the war - Raoul - 10/9/2004 8:20:57 AM
  • re: Here's a scenario for ya - gbaikie - 10/8/2004 12:08:59 PM
    • re: Here's a scenario for ya - SteveS - 10/8/2004 11:59:13 PM
  • re: Here's a scenario for ya - Raoul - 10/8/2004 7:48:29 AM
    • If a nuclear bomb wasn't a deterrent to Israel, why did Israel take Saddam's out? - SteveS - 10/8/2004 9:08:42 PM
  • Pakistan. Pakistan is/was the proliferator. - Bowser - 10/8/2004 3:37:58 AM
    • Not any more. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/8/2004 6:12:49 PM
      • And you know that how? - Bowser - 10/8/2004 6:56:53 PM
        • Proving a negative? - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2004 4:57:42 PM
          • You are the one who said they are NOT doing it. I assume you have a basis for that statement. - Bowser - 10/10/2004 12:47:34 AM