Media: Australian victory for Howard? So what?

Tom Brosz — 10/11/2004 4:12:53 PM (archived)

A short item here.

Does anyone have the slightest doubt that had Howard lost by the same margin, it would have been ALL ABOUT Iraq in our media?

The massive Howard victory, which squelched the "even race" predictions and included other electoral victories, may be a little to scary for the media right now. ;)

The whole thread (18 posts)

Media: Australian victory for Howard? So what? - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2004 4:12:53 PM
- Let's start with "no casualties in Iraq" - E.P. Grondine - 10/12/2004 1:18:51 AM
- You are quite right. The Australian election had nothing to with Iraq. It was a completely domestic affair. - Daniel - 10/11/2004 5:21:52 PM
  - Trust that it would be very very different if the anti-Bush candidate ahd won. - ebnelson - 10/11/2004 7:07:41 PM
    - .. demonstrating the differences between the 2 nations - Daniel - 10/11/2004 7:27:11 PM
      - I understand and appreciate the difference. - ebnelson - 10/12/2004 12:06:29 AM
  - coupla more points - Daniel - 10/11/2004 5:42:07 PM
    - re: points - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2004 6:03:37 PM
      - History Rewrite - Tony - 10/11/2004 6:52:32 PM
        
        re: History Rewrite - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2004 8:02:18 PM
        
        re: History Rewrite - Tony - 10/11/2004 8:37:43 PM
        
        re: History Rewrite - Mark Eby - 10/12/2004 2:23:19 AM
      - agreed re Australia, but not re Spain - Daniel - 10/11/2004 6:21:49 PM
        
        re: Spain - Raoul - 10/11/2004 6:44:45 PM
        
        so it was not an antiwar vote, then? - Daniel - 10/11/2004 6:51:20 PM
- One can tell when the good guys are winning by how little the MSM reports it. - ebnelson - 10/11/2004 4:19:03 PM
  - That's almost an axiom. - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2004 4:55:52 PM
    - Conservatives love their martyrdom. Delight in being victims. - Bowser - 10/11/2004 7:47:31 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (18 posts)