Space/Science » in reply to Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized

The whole thread (22 posts)

• Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - Philip Simon - 10/11/2004 11:42:31 PM
  • They seem localized to the Meridiani region. - REB - 10/13/2004 12:32:09 PM
    • re: They seem localized to the Meridiani region. - Nick Hoffman - 10/14/2004 8:05:11 AM
      • re: They seem localized to the Meridiani region. - REB - 10/14/2004 12:34:05 PM
      • re: They seem localized to the Meridiani region. - REB - 10/14/2004 11:48:28 AM
        • uhhh - here ya go - E.P. Grondine - 10/15/2004 1:10:06 AM
        • Good. - Nick Hoffman - 10/14/2004 2:05:37 PM
          • re: Good. - REB - 10/14/2004 2:10:35 PM
  • re: Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - REB - 10/12/2004 2:36:49 PM
  • re: Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - Nick Hoffman - 10/12/2004 4:39:29 AM
    • re: Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - bruced - 10/13/2004 11:30:10 PM
      • increased local crystallinity - Philip Simon - 10/14/2004 11:40:24 PM
        • re: increased local crystallinity - bruced - 10/15/2004 8:25:12 AM
          • Surface films - Nick Hoffman - 10/15/2004 11:57:50 PM
    • re: Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - E.P. Grondine - 10/12/2004 2:03:28 PM
  • link please, sounds interesting. (n/t) - jms - 10/12/2004 1:56:45 AM
    • re: link please, sounds interesting. - Marcia - 10/12/2004 4:51:50 AM
      • Thanks Marcia, I'll take notes. - jms - 10/12/2004 4:59:50 AM
  • Yeah, they're tectites - E.P. Grondine - 10/12/2004 12:55:38 AM
    • re: Yeah, you're a geologist (n/t) - Mark Eby - 10/12/2004 1:43:58 AM
      • No, I just get tired of the Mars Nuts' BS (n/t) - E.P. Grondine - 10/12/2004 2:04:24 AM
        • re: If you explained how they could be tektites it would be more interesting. You Moon Nut. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/12/2004 9:07:21 AM