Politics is dirty, dishonest business and the Republicans wallow in the mud like they were born there. But I think we can all agree they aren't alone. Heck, just look at the crap-slinging fest this board has become. You're not safe from a face-full no matter which way you're headed.
So when did dealing with a nuclear Iran become OK? When it became useful to the White House, I suppose. If Kerry says it again, we'll find out it's an absurdity. Amazing creatures, these spin-meisters, they can rotate in both directions at once.
My question would be, do politicians and their minions acknowledge the compartmentalization? Something is an absurd idea when Kerry says it, but a stroke of brilliance when the very same thing comes from the White House. I mean, it's so blatant on both extremes that they *must* see it, don't you think?
And why in hell have we permitted politics to get like this?
ps...thank gawd we *are* talking with Iran, though...the thought of a military conflict with them makes me want to barf.
Current Events » in reply to Nuclear Iran
Point taken, Tony
The whole thread (22 posts)
- Nuclear Iran
- Iran Mocks Kerry's Idea for a Deal on Uranium
- Recently the USA sold Israel several hundred "bunker buster" anti-fortification weapons. There are no hardened targets in the Occupied Territories. I suspect Iran is intended target.
- Can't have it both ways: Do you want alternatives to war attempted or not?
- Point taken, Tony
- re: Kerry has been unfit for the Presidency for a lot longer than 2 weeks.
