re: re:NO! Bush doesn't have a mandate.

Current Events » in reply to re:NO! Bush doesn't have a mandate.

re: re:NO! Bush doesn't have a mandate.

Mark Eby — 11/11/2004 2:56:14 AM (archived)

I don't know what the moral values mandate is, I just know he got one. I guess it's legitimate to claim a poorly understood issue can't be a mandate, but it's politically dangerous to bet against it. I do understand the terror mandate as it has been discussed here and elsewhere over and over.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (34 posts)

No Mandate! 3% is well with in the noise! - Chris Vancil - 11/9/2004 11:07:31 PM
- I Really Don't See The Need For Personal Insults - Mark Eby - 11/10/2004 3:22:15 AM
  - Chagrin, shame and blushing. But he has no points to address. (n/t) - ebnelson - 11/10/2004 5:20:42 PM
  - I agree with Mark - Gary - 11/10/2004 4:16:37 AM
  - Well, I do, but I'm trying to restrain myself. - Tom Brosz - 11/10/2004 3:25:40 AM
- Amazing. - Tom Brosz - 11/10/2004 1:16:39 AM
  - re: What a load of BS! Nobody would have claimed a Mandate for Gore! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 1:21:44 AM
    - The Point Was They Claimed He Won - Mark Eby - 11/10/2004 3:24:38 AM
    - re: What a load of BS - Tom Brosz - 11/10/2004 3:24:11 AM
- I have this vision of Chrissie standing on a corner in Seattle with his spare change sign, that is now saying "Moving to Canada. Need Money" with his fingers in his ears yelling, "No mandate! No mand… - ebnelson - 11/10/2004 1:08:16 AM
- Try 5% when it's all counted 4+ seats in the House 4+ seats in the senate, that's a mandate! (n/t) - SteveS - 11/10/2004 12:57:32 AM
  - 1% over the noise what a mandate! Oh, I'm so impressed! This Lame Duck is just so impressive! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 1:26:06 AM
    - So now it's how much of a mandate, add the senate/house gains and weep - SteveS - 11/10/2004 1:44:51 AM
- You are an idiot seeking idots to support your idiocy and you have found them in this. (n/t) - ebnelson - 11/10/2004 12:27:13 AM
  - re: Go ahead call me names, Ed. Long agao I figured you out. The more you fear something the more names you throw at the messager. He has no Mandate. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 12:36:35 AM
    - Chrissie-poo, you know nothing. the bigger the idiot, the more I ridicule. You even top Bowser. And Bush doesn't need your permission to be President. Deal with it. - ebnelson - 11/10/2004 12:59:51 AM
      - re: Yeah, sure Ed. You flatter me no end. Non the less he is a lame duck with out a Mandate unless you really mean a man date. What is Bush ranching bicycles? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 1:30:49 AM
- So where does the constitution call for a mandate before a President gets to push his agenda? - ebnelson - 11/10/2004 12:24:29 AM
  - re: So you admit he has no Mandate? Thanks! Who's the real idiot, Ed? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 12:41:20 AM
    - re:Who's the real idiot, Ed? You know the answer to that - ebnelson - 11/10/2004 1:01:11 AM
      - re: All this does is show how limited your ability to argue is. He still has no Mandate! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 1:24:05 AM
        
        Oh Yes He Does - Mark Eby - 11/10/2004 3:16:45 AM
        
        re:NO! Bush doesn't have a mandate. - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 9:24:35 AM
        
        re: re:NO! Bush doesn't have a mandate. - Mark Eby - 11/11/2004 2:56:14 AM
- 3% Isn't Noise In An Actual Vote - Mark Eby - 11/10/2004 12:02:04 AM
  - re: Oh yes it is. At least 3% erroneously filled in, punched or push the wrong button. Doesn't matter Bush has no mandate and he is a lame duck! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 12:08:55 AM
    - You Are Embarassing Yourself - Mark Eby - 11/10/2004 3:08:55 AM
    - Doesn't matter Bush has no mandate and he is a lame duck! - gbaikie - 11/10/2004 12:28:14 AM
      - re: Sure any thing you say Geoff he is going to touch lots of third rails. He has no Mandate and is in fact a lame duck and cannot legally run again (as the term means). (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 12:39:39 AM
        
        re: Sure any thing you say Geoff - gbaikie - 11/10/2004 1:56:24 AM
- re: No Mandate! 3% is well with in the noise! - gbaikie - 11/9/2004 11:52:34 PM
  - re: Sorry Geoff he has no Mandate! 3% is within the zone of error! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 12:00:56 AM
    - For polling to predict elections it could be within "zone of error", but in a election it's decisive. (n/t) - gbaikie - 11/10/2004 12:13:33 AM
      - re:BS he has no Mandate. It's always the way that the winner trys to redefine mean of words. Mandate is not going to be one of those words. He is a lame duck with no mandate face it! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/10/2004 12:19:53 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (34 posts)